DiscoverCars.Com

Mahindra XUV 3XO vs Kia Syros turbo-petrol automatic mileage compared

Mahindra XUV 3XO vs Kia Syros turbo-petrol automatic mileage compared

The Mahindra XUV 3XO is the manufacturer’s most affordable SUV in India, and is offered with two turbo-petrol and one diesel engine option. In the compact SUV segment, one of its key rivals is the Kia Syros, which is also offered with a turbo-petrol and diesel option. So, how fuel-efficient are both the XUV 3XO and Syros in real-world conditions? We compare the turbo-petrol automatic options to find out. 

XUV 3XO vs Syros turbo-petrol AT: Specifications and price

The XUV 3XO gets a bigger engine that produces more power and torque

XUV 3XO vs Syros turbo-petrol AT: Specifications and price

 

Mahindra XUV 3XO

Kia Syros

Engine

3-cyl, turbo-petrol

3-cyl, turbo-petrol

Displacement (cc)

1,197

998

Power (hp)

131

120

Torque (Nm)

230

172

Transmission

6-speed AT

7-speed DCT

Fuel tank (litres)

42

45

Claimed ARAI mileage (kpl) 18.2kpl 17.68kpl

Both the XUV 3XO and Syros offer a 3-cylinder T-GDi turbo-petrol engine, but the Mahindra mill has a higher displacement than the Kia rival and produces 11hp and 58Nm more. The Mahindra offering is also 0.52kpl more frugal than the Kia rival as per the claimed ARAI mileage figures. The turbo-petrol engine of the Mahindra XUV 3XO gets a 6-speed torque converter, while the Syros gets a 7-speed dual-clutch automatic gearbox.

XUV 3XO vs Syros turbo-petrol AT: Real-world fuel efficiency

The XUV 3XO outshines the Syros in all real-world mileage aspects

XUV 3XO vs Syros turbo-petrol AT: Real-world mileage

 

Mahindra XUV 3XO

Kia Syros

Tested city mileage (kpl)

9.89kpl

8.30kpl

Tested highway mileage (kpl)

13.01kpl

11.50kpl

Tested average mileage (kpl)

11.45kpl

9.90kpl

Tested range (km)

480.9

445.5

The Mahindra XUV 3XO was slightly more fuel efficient than the Kia Syros in our real-world fuel efficiency tests. In city and highway driving conditions, the Mahindra compact SUV was 1.59kpl and 1.51kpl more efficient than the Kia offering, respectively. This resulted in the Mahindra XUV 3XO having a higher overall fuel efficiency by 1.55kpl.

The Syros has a 3-litre bigger fuel tank, but the Mahindra XUV 3XO can travel 35.4km more than the Syros on a full tank of fuel, owing to its higher fuel efficiency.

The XUV 3XO is more affordable than the Syros in its top-end

XUV 3XO vs Syros turbo-petrol AT: Price range

 

Mahindra XUV 3XO

Kia Syros

Price range (Rs, lakh)

12.84-14.55

11.92-15.29

The Syros’ lower-spec turbo-petrol DCT option costs Rs 92,000 less than the XUV 3XO. The top-spec Mahindra XUV 3XO with such a powertrain combination is Rs 74,000 more affordable than the Kia rival.

Autocar India’s fuel efficiency testing

Before our real-world fuel efficiency tests, we fill our test cars’ tanks to the brim and maintain tyre pressures based on the manufacturer’s recommendations. These cars are driven in fixed city and highway loops in and around Navi Mumbai, and we maintain a set of average speeds. Throughout the tests, there is only one person in each car, running the air conditioner and other electricals, such as the audio system, indicators and wipers, when required, just like a regular user would. Periodic driver swaps further neutralise variations in driver patterns. At the end of each cycle, we calculate efficiency by refilling the tanks to full.

Prices are ex-showroom, India.



from Autocar India https://ift.tt/sakTPKp

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Hyundai Exter variant wise powertrain details revealed

New Maruti Dzire spy shots show first in segment sunroof

New MG 4 EV revealed as Creta sized hatchback